Subject	huh? (n/m)
Posted by	Kenny 9 psi on September 29, 2003 at 11:51 AM
	This message has been viewed 25 times.
In Reply To	See above (n/m) posted by ZBlacktt on September 29, 2003 at 10:03 AM
Message
Follow Ups	went to steel sunday - MPH165 08:42:07 09/29/03 Great times Brad - kryptonite729 08:52:16 09/29/03 I broke my EEPROM - Chip(GMS Racing) 12:12:58 09/29/03 Your times are suspect until you provide time slips. (n/m) - JRH(KY) 09:04:09 09/29/03 His word can be trusted. I saw him run 11.9 in person. (n/m) - Kenny 9 psi 09:21:25 09/29/03 See above (n/m) - ZBlacktt 10:03:04 09/29/03 huh? (n/m) - Kenny 9 psi 11:51:33 09/29/03 Since when was making claims like that without slips - JRH(KY) 10:20:02 09/29/03 K. - Kenny 9 psi 11:37:23 09/29/03 He has proven 11.6, so how is this questionable? - Chip(GMS Racing) 12:11:31 09/29/03 So why can't he produce slips for these runs? (n/m) - JRH(KY) 12:21:27 09/29/03 Maybe he doesn't have a scanner. - Kenny 9 psi 13:24:49 09/29/03 the times are valid - kryptonite729 10:09:04 09/29/03 Cool, can you fill out your profile now, please :) (n/m) - ZBlacktt 10:03:40 09/29/03 Good running Brad, your car is quick as hell (n/m) - John@Z1 18:04:43 09/29/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.